Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Court case - what are we missing !!

Click here for the Master Plan 2021

In reply to the court, DDA has quoted table 5.1, which mentions office is permitted. However all our lawyer has to do is highlight the sections 5.6 and table 5.5 to the court, which clearly mentions only those offices are allowed which cater to local population.

As the present office is a corporate office of a MNC company it cannot function in a local shopping center.

Why relevant points are not being told to court and case being made more complicated is v v confusing..


Following is the high court site link for getting the details on the court case.

No comments: